"Clear after" doesn't work as expected

[pokey]

I would expect it to delete the trailing delimiter and leave the cursor there

[AndreasArvidsson]

Well after inner selection is just "end of". So far only outer selection has anything to do with delimiters. So I would argue that it actually does exactly what I expected it to :D

[pokey]

Then how would you propose to do what I wanted to have happen? It is useful functionality. I guess I could do "clear outer after". But we're kind of wasting the "after" / "end of" distinction in this case.

We could have a "trailing delimiter" / "leading delimiter" modifier rather than reusing "before" / "after". We might then even remove support for positional modifiers in arbitrary places and restrict them to things like "bring after". We'd then still need an answer for "past end of". Idk

[AndreasArvidsson]

This is a hard one. We could always add a proper position for end of but we still have a problem with change after air to hello that command shouldn't actually replace anything and just insert the text after.
We could of course make the actions themselves aware of different positions and have different actions do different things with the after position, but that's a tricky one as well.

[pokey]

So I think based on our last discussion, we want to support this one, no? Because "after" would transform the selection into something where the content itself is the delimiter, so "clear" would target it

[AndreasArvidsson]

Yes this will be supported after we do the new oo targets.

[pokey]

Better to solve this one with #309