Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On Linux Support, Older Versions of GLIBC #20

Closed
lordbuddha opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

On Linux Support, Older Versions of GLIBC #20

lordbuddha opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lordbuddha
Copy link

Raising this as a new issue as #17 was closed I think incorrectly.

Yes want a tgz artifact, but my point was that we need the Linux binaries linked such that those binaries will run on older versions of Linux which have older versions of GLIBC.

The current RPM contains binaries that require GLIBC_2.14.

But RHEL 6 only has GLIBC_2.12. Sure I could use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to supply my own GLIBC version, but that is more awkward then just being able to use what is there.

I pointed out in #17 that OpenJDK from Azul will work on GLIBC_2.5.

So there really seems to be no reason why Corretto-8 could not be built such that it will run on RHEL 6 (or other antiques of that ilk).

@davecurrie davecurrie added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 21, 2018
@davecurrie davecurrie self-assigned this Nov 21, 2018
@davecurrie
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your suggestion. I see that this is different from #10, so we'll keep this enhancement request open too.

@davecurrie davecurrie added this to the General Availability milestone Dec 5, 2018
@alvdavi
Copy link
Contributor

alvdavi commented Jan 16, 2019

Corretto8 preview2 has been released. Versions listed as "Linux x64" target GLIBC_2.11.

That should allow its execution on RHEL6 and also on Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty Tahr) and Debian Jessie.

@alvdavi alvdavi closed this as completed Jan 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants