Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Check >2GB direct .conda creation versus ZIP #248

Closed
2 tasks done
dholth opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #249
Closed
2 tasks done

Check >2GB direct .conda creation versus ZIP #248

dholth opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #249
Labels
in-progress issue is actively being worked on locked [bot] locked due to inactivity severity::1 blocker; broken functionality with no workaround source::anaconda created by members of Anaconda, Inc. type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type

Comments

@dholth
Copy link
Contributor

dholth commented Jun 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Checklist

  • I added a descriptive title
  • I searched open reports and couldn't find a duplicate

What happened?

https://github.com/conda/conda-package-handling/blob/main/src/conda_package_handling/conda_fmt.py#L105-L121 is part of the code that creates .conda directly instead of going through .tar.bz2 first.

We need to create 3GB of /dev/random and try to put it into a .conda, to see if this code suffers from the same ZIP64 deficiency as conda/conda-package-streaming#79
@dholth dholth added the type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type label Jun 6, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in 🧭 Planning Jun 6, 2024
This was referenced Jun 6, 2024
Closed
Merged
@dholth dholth added the in-progress issue is actively being worked on label Jun 6, 2024
@dholth dholth moved this from 🆕 New to 👀 In Review in 🧭 Planning Jun 6, 2024
@kenodegard kenodegard added source::anaconda created by members of Anaconda, Inc. severity::1 blocker; broken functionality with no workaround labels Jun 6, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In Review to 🏁 Done in 🧭 Planning Jun 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Dec 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
in-progress issue is actively being worked on locked [bot] locked due to inactivity severity::1 blocker; broken functionality with no workaround source::anaconda created by members of Anaconda, Inc. type::bug describes erroneous operation, use severity::* to classify the type
Projects
🧭 Planning
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use force_zip64=True when directly creating .conda files conda/conda-package-handling
2 participants
@dholth @kenodegard