Add new list please!

[K-mikaZ]

I have create a list that boost page loading by automatically creating redirect rules based on gorhill's redirect-rule (which are often omitted but important) for all present and futur filters/lists.

You can find it here: Noop-My-Filters-Please (the RAW version)

You can test it before, of course.

[K-mikaZ]

precision:
Only for ublock and nano adblocker
It's not really a block list, it only applies the appropriate redirects to each filter that has omitted to specify it.
e.g:
the filter ||theBlockedSite.tld
become:
||theBlockedSite.tld$script,redirect-rule=noopjs if it is a script concern,
||theBlockedSite.tld$xhr,redirect-rule=nooptext if it is a xhr concern...

screenshot
Imgur

[gwarser]

Your list is not valid.

I don't believe providing any response will be faster than just aborting network request.

You need to read more about pre-parsing directives - !#if. For example only these tokens are supported:

ext_ublock
env_chromium
env_edge
env_firefox
env_mobile
env_safari
false
cap_html_filtering
cap_user_stylesheet

[K-mikaZ]

Your list is not valid.
You need to read more about pre-parsing directives - !#if. For example only these tokens are supported:

OK, but take a look at the screenshot and explain why it works.
And the link that you give me (and for information that I have already read) points to AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#917 which explains:

Conditions:
...
Condition supports all the basic logical operators.

I don't believe providing any response will be faster than just aborting network request.

Test and tell me if it doesn't.
And please, explain to me why gorhill would create a redirect-rule if it was useless?

[liamengland1]

These are the only valid directive values in uBo: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/blob/bc7f1492522f08477325242d95f4fd3992bf5d42/src/js/storage.js#L907

These are some, probably all, valid directive values in adguard: https://kb.adguard.com/en/general/how-to-create-your-own-ad-filters#what-constants-we-declare

The redirect-rule is not to speed up the browser. It is used for fixing breakages, anti-adblock, and making list writing easier.

[gwarser]

OK, but take a look at the screenshot and explain why it works.

Because unknown directives are ignored. All filters are parsed.

And the link that you give me (and for information that I have already read) points to AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#917 which explains:

So, your filter is only for AdGuard? uBO does not support most of the logic. These are pre-parsing directives, even if "logic" works they will not be dynamically updated based on request type, because they are "executed" only when list is loaded (downloaded/updated).

Test and tell me if it doesn't.

This is your list. You need to prove it's useful.

And please, explain to me why gorhill would create a redirect-rule if it was useless?

To fix anti-adblockers which expect some content to be returned in response.

[uBlock-user]

And please, explain to me why gorhill would create a redirect-rule if it was useless?

redirect-rule provides ease for redirecting already existing blocking filters with responses and only creates 1 filter instead of 2(as seen by using $redirect)

To quote the wiki -- Standalone redirect directives are useful when the blocking of a resource is optional but we still want the resource to be redirected should it ever be blocked by whatever mean - whether through a separate block filter, a dynamic filtering rule, etc.

[gorhill]

boost page loading by automatically creating redirect rules

Claims like this needs to be substantiated with evidences and in a way that everybody can reproduce.

[gwarser]

@K-mikaZ after all - thank you! Thanks to your list we learned that ping, beacon, and websocket redirecion is pointless/invalid and redirecting to empty creates redirection regardless of type. Besides that, snapshot of your list will be used to test pre-parsing directives.

😄