Can this nogil implementation also provide improvements for asyncio?

[darowny]

So I was wondering if there is a chance to improve asyncio alongside nogil or maybe nogil already improves asyncio? (like threadpool offloading or sth?)

I was also wondering if now one could do something like lightweight processes inside Python with scheduler - similar to Erlang ?
I am really not sure if this question makes sense.
I am sorry if this is confusing or I said something wrong, I might not understand nogil correctly, or even how Python internally works.

[colesbury]

So I was wondering if there is a chance to improve asyncio alongside nogil or maybe nogil already improves asyncio?

The "nogil" fork doesn't change or improve asyncio. It might be possible to do something involving thread pools, but I'm not sure.

I was also wondering if now one could do something like lightweight processes inside Python...

I think lightweight processes/"green threads" is a compelling idea. The "nogil" fork is potentially a step in that direction, but there still would be a large amount of work necessary to implement lightweight processes efficiently and I'm not currently working on that.