Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove & replace .fancy-link and .fancy-link:hover classes #1170

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

wolfofdalalst
Copy link
Contributor

✨ Codu Pull Request 💻

Fixes #1160

Pull Request details

In order to transition away from global styles, I have removed and .fancy-link and .fancy-link:hover from styles/globals.css, and replaced it with the equivalent tailwindcss classes, as requested in the above mentioned issue. If there are any changes, do let me know, I will make the necessary changes required. I am working under the hacktoberfest label.

Any Breaking changes

None

Associated Screenshots

None

@wolfofdalalst wolfofdalalst requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 03:05
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 23, 2024

@wolfofdalalst is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several changes across multiple components, primarily focusing on updating the visual styling of links by replacing the .fancy-link class with new gradient background styles. This change enhances the appearance of links in the GetStarted, Create, ArticlePreview, CommentsArea, and EditorHints components. Additionally, the globals.css file has been modified to remove the .fancy-link class entirely, aligning with a more component-based styling approach. The core functionality and logic of the components remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx Updated class names for the home link to include gradient background and hover effects.
app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx Modified link styles in instructional text and refined tag handling logic.
components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx Changed class names for "Read full article" link to a gradient background style.
components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx Updated styling for sign-in and sign-up buttons with new gradient classes.
components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx Altered class names for links to the Markdown guide with gradient styles.
styles/globals.css Removed .fancy-link and .fancy-link:hover classes, maintaining existing utility classes.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove the .fancy-link and .fancy-link:hover classes (1160)
Apply styles directly within relevant components (1160)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

hacktoberfest-accepted, hacktoberfest

Suggested reviewers

  • NiallJoeMaher

Poem

In the garden of code, where the links do play,
A gradient dance brightens up the day.
From fancy to flashy, they twirl and they spin,
Enhancing the beauty, let the fun begin!
With buttons that shimmer and hints that delight,
Our components now sparkle, oh what a sight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Hello @wolfofdalalst, thanks for opening your first Pull Request. The maintainers will review this Pull Request and provide feedback as soon as possible. Keep up the great work!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (5)

Line range hint 1-838: Consider breaking down this large component into smaller, focused components.

The Create component is handling multiple responsibilities including:

  • Form management
  • File upload
  • Tag management
  • Preview functionality
  • Publication scheduling

This makes the component harder to maintain and test.

Consider extracting these into separate components:

  1. PostForm - Handle the main form logic
  2. ImageUploader - Handle image upload functionality
  3. TagManager - Handle tag input and management
  4. PreviewPane - Handle the preview rendering
  5. PublishSettings - Handle publication settings

This would improve maintainability and make the code more testable.


Line range hint 32-38: Enhance form validation for better user experience.

The form validation could be improved by adding validation schemas using Zod.

Consider adding this validation schema:

const PostFormSchema = z.object({
  title: z.string().min(5, "Title must be at least 5 characters"),
  body: z.string().min(10, "Content must be at least 10 characters"),
  tags: z.array(z.string()).max(5, "Maximum 5 tags allowed"),
  excerpt: z.string().max(156, "Excerpt must not exceed 156 characters").optional(),
  canonicalUrl: z.string().url("Must be a valid URL").optional(),
  published: z.date().optional()
});

Line range hint 89-141: Simplify tag management logic.

The current tag management implementation is verbose and could be simplified.

Consider this more concise implementation:

const handleTagInput = (e: React.KeyboardEvent) => {
  const tag = tagValue.trim().toUpperCase().replace(/[^\w\s]/gi, "");
  
  if (!["Enter", ",", "."].includes(e.key) || !tag) return;
  
  e.preventDefault();
  
  if (tags.includes(tag)) {
    setError("tags", { message: "Tag already exists" });
  } else if (tags.length >= 5) {
    setError("tags", { message: "Maximum 5 tags allowed" });
  } else {
    clearErrors("tags");
    setTags([...tags, tag]);
  }
  
  setTagValue("");
};

Line range hint 142-196: Extract file upload logic into a custom hook.

The file upload logic could be extracted into a reusable hook for better maintainability.

Consider creating a custom hook:

const useImageUpload = () => {
  const [uploadUrl, setUploadUrl] = useState<string | null>(null);
  const [uploadStatus, setUploadStatus] = useState<UploadStatus>("default");

  const handleUpload = async (file: File) => {
    setUploadStatus("loading");
    try {
      const signedUrl = await getUploadUrl({
        size: file.size,
        type: file.type,
        uploadType: "uploads"
      });
      const { fileLocation } = await uploadFile(signedUrl, file);
      setUploadUrl(fileLocation);
      setUploadStatus("success");
      return fileLocation;
    } catch (error) {
      setUploadStatus("error");
      throw error;
    }
  };

  return { uploadUrl, uploadStatus, handleUpload };
};

Line range hint 197-224: Consider implementing auto-save with optimistic updates.

The current save implementation could be enhanced with optimistic updates and better error handling.

Consider implementing a more robust auto-save mechanism:

const useAutoSave = (formData: SavePostInput, postId?: string) => {
  const [savedTime, setSavedTime] = useState<string>("");
  const [isSaving, setIsSaving] = useState(false);
  
  const save = useMutation({
    mutationFn: async (data: SavePostInput) => {
      setIsSaving(true);
      try {
        const result = postId 
          ? await api.post.update.mutate({ ...data, id: postId })
          : await api.post.create.mutate(data);
        setSavedTime(new Date().toLocaleString());
        return result;
      } finally {
        setIsSaving(false);
      }
    }
  });

  return { save, savedTime, isSaving };
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4102dd and 57b1265.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (2 hunks)
  • components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (2 hunks)
  • styles/globals.css (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • styles/globals.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (1)

32-34: LGTM! Successfully migrated from global styles to Tailwind.

The transition from .fancy-link to Tailwind utility classes has been implemented correctly, maintaining the gradient effect while following component-based styling best practices.

components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1)

161-161: Verify visual consistency of the new gradient styling.

The transition from .fancy-link to Tailwind classes looks good. However, let's ensure the new gradient styling maintains visual consistency with other components that have undergone similar changes.

Let's verify the consistency of gradient styles across components:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the gradient styling consistency across components.


Let me try one more time with just ripgrep's basic pattern matching without file type specifications.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

The gradient styling is consistent across the codebase

The new gradient styling in ArticlePreview.tsx matches the pattern used consistently throughout the application. The specific gradient combination (from-orange-400 to-pink-600 with hover states hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500) is used across multiple components for interactive elements and text, maintaining a cohesive visual language. The search results show no remaining .fancy-link classes, indicating successful migration to Tailwind classes.

Key observations:

  • The same gradient pattern is used in similar interactive elements across components
  • Text-based gradients consistently use bg-clip-text text-transparent with the same color scheme
  • Hover states are consistently implemented
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar gradient styling patterns across components to ensure consistency
rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-\d+ to-pink-\d+" --type tsx

Length of output: 90


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar gradient styling patterns across components using different file extensions
rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-\d+ to-pink-\d+" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx -t js

# Also search for any other gradient patterns to compare styling
rg "bg-gradient-to-r.*text-transparent" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx -t js

# Check if there are any remaining .fancy-link classes that haven't been migrated
rg "fancy-link" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx -t js -t css

Length of output: 278


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for gradient styling patterns
rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange" --type-list
rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange"

# Search for any remaining fancy-link classes
rg "fancy-link"

# List all files with .tsx extension to verify file type handling
fd ".*\.tsx$"

Length of output: 16669

app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (1)

42-44: LGTM! Consider adding underline for better link visibility.

The changes successfully replace the global .fancy-link class with Tailwind utility classes, maintaining the gradient styling while following component-based approach. The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives.

Consider adding underline or hover:underline class to maintain conventional link appearance and improve accessibility:

-<Link className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent font-medium hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500" href="/">
+<Link className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent font-medium hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500 hover:underline" href="/">

Let's verify the consistency of link styling across other components mentioned in the AI summary:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different search strategy to verify the link styling consistency across the codebase.

The first command will help us find similar gradient-styled links, while the second command will help verify if there are any remaining fancy-link classes in the codebase. I've expanded the file types to include all possible JavaScript/TypeScript extensions and CSS files.


Let me try one more time with ripgrep without file type specifications:

This should help us verify both the consistency of gradient styling and ensure the removal of fancy-link classes across the codebase.


Let me check the globals.css file to verify if the fancy-link class still exists:

This will help us confirm if the .fancy-link class has been completely removed from the global styles.


Based on the comprehensive results from our verification, I can now provide the final response:

Changes are consistent and .fancy-link has been successfully removed

The verification confirms that:

  1. The .fancy-link class has been completely removed from globals.css
  2. The gradient styling is consistently used across the codebase for similar interactive elements
  3. The implementation in get-started/_client.tsx aligns with the existing pattern used in other components like EditorHints, CommentsArea, and ArticlePreview

The original review suggestion about adding hover:underline was a nitpick that isn't necessary since the codebase consistently uses gradient styling without underlines for these types of links, maintaining a cohesive design system.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might need similar styling updates
rg "fancy-link" --type tsx

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Link components with similar gradient styling
rg "bg-gradient.*to-pink" -t ts -t tsx -t jsx -t js

# Also search for any remaining fancy-link classes
rg "fancy-link" -t ts -t tsx -t jsx -t js -t css

Length of output: 158


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Link components with similar gradient styling
rg "bg-gradient.*to-pink"

# Search for any remaining fancy-link classes
rg "fancy-link"

# List all files with .css extension to check for global styles
fd ".css$"

Length of output: 11105


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the contents of globals.css
cat styles/globals.css

Length of output: 8448

app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (1)

797-799: LGTM: Link styles successfully migrated from global CSS to Tailwind.

The .fancy-link class has been correctly replaced with Tailwind's gradient utilities, aligning with the PR's objective to move away from global styles.

Also applies to: 806-808

Comment on lines +41 to 43
className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500"
>
markdownguide
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider extracting duplicate styles into a reusable class.

The gradient styling is duplicated between both links. Consider using Tailwind's @apply directive or creating a common className variable to maintain consistency and reduce duplication.

Here's how you could refactor this:

const gradientLinkStyle = "cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500";

// Then use it in both links:
className={gradientLinkStyle}

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ const ArticlePreview: NextPage<Props> = ({
<div className="flex w-full content-center justify-between">
<div className="flex w-full items-center justify-between">
<Link
className="fancy-link semibold text-lg"
className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500 semibold text-lg"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider extracting the gradient styles into a reusable class.

While the inline Tailwind classes work, consider extracting this commonly used gradient style into a reusable class in your Tailwind config to maintain consistency and make future updates easier.

You could add this to your tailwind.config.js:

module.exports = {
  theme: {
    extend: {
      // Add a custom class for gradient links
      textGradient: {
        'link': 'bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500',
      },
    },
  },
}

Then simplify the component usage to:

-className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500 semibold text-lg"
+className="cursor-pointer text-gradient-link bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent semibold text-lg"

@wolfofdalalst wolfofdalalst changed the title Fix Remove & replace .fancy-link and .fancy-link:hover classes Oct 23, 2024
@wolfofdalalst
Copy link
Contributor Author

@John-Paul-Larkin changes have been made.

@wolfofdalalst
Copy link
Contributor Author

@John-Paul-Larkin all checks have passed, please review.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
codu ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 24, 2024 7:08am

Copy link
Contributor

@NiallJoeMaher NiallJoeMaher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🌮 🦖

@NiallJoeMaher NiallJoeMaher merged commit 051f633 into codu-code:develop Oct 24, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue: Transitioning Away from Global Styles in globals.css
3 participants