We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
it would be great if we could add annotations into the code in order to prevent the detection of false-positives.
sometimes you just do not have any choice of wording, but still do not want to add a global ignore for a given word.
something like this:
struct v4l2_streamparm param. // codespell-ignore parm param.parm.capture.timeperframe.numerator = 1;
suggested keywords (just ideas; alternatively map the cmdline args, or whatever; though I quite like the possibility to end additional ignore-rules)
codespell-ignore
codespell-unignore
codespell-ignoreonce
this would also help to run codespell without any arguments
codespell
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicate of #1212.
Sorry, something went wrong.
ouch, thanks for spotting this. i did search the issue tracker first, but unfortunately used the wrong search terms.
@umlaeute You're welcome. Thank you for helping out.
No branches or pull requests
it would be great if we could add annotations into the code in order to prevent the detection of false-positives.
sometimes you just do not have any choice of wording, but still do not want to add a global ignore for a given word.
something like this:
suggested keywords (just ideas; alternatively map the cmdline args, or whatever; though I quite like the possibility to end additional ignore-rules)
codespell-ignore
start ignoring the given words within the current filecodespell-unignore
start ignoring the given words within the current file (falling back to the original state, as defined via the cmdline)codespell-ignoreonce
only ignore the next occurence of the wordthis would also help to run
codespell
without any argumentsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: