You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It was noticed in #45888 that there is a class of schema evolution failures (at least the case of TStreamerInfo being missing #41348) where a file produced with the default splitlevel (99) reads back in a later release fine, but a file produced with splitlevel 0 fails. The production (both data and MC) use primarily (or always?) splitlevel 0, so we should update all the RAW schema evolution tests to include the splitlevel 0 as well.
Following packages are concerned (links are to their READMEs)
It was noticed in #45888 that there is a class of schema evolution failures (at least the case of
TStreamerInfo
being missing #41348) where a file produced with the default splitlevel (99) reads back in a later release fine, but a file produced with splitlevel 0 fails. The production (both data and MC) use primarily (or always?) splitlevel 0, so we should update all the RAW schema evolution tests to include the splitlevel 0 as well.Following packages are concerned (links are to their READMEs)
DataFormats/Common
DataFormats/DetId
DataFormats/FEDRawData
DataFormats/HLTReco
DataFormats/L1Scouting
DataFormats/L1ScoutingRawData
DataFormats/L1TGlobal
DataFormats/Scouting
DataFormats/SiStripCluster
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: