-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3 #35279
Comments
Request received. I will start to build the release after one of the following approve the issue: @perrotta, @smuzaffar, @qliphy, @dpiparo. You can do this by writing "+1" in a comment. |
+1 |
Release created: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/releases/tag/CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3. The tag was created on top of branch: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/tree/master |
Queuing Jenkins build for the following architectures: cc8_amd64_gcc9, cc8_aarch64_gcc9, slc7_aarch64_gcc9, cc8_ppc64le_gcc9, slc7_amd64_gcc10, slc7_amd64_gcc900, slc7_ppc64le_gcc9 |
The build has started for cc8_amd64_gcc9 in cmsbuild19. |
The build has started for slc7_amd64_gcc900 in cmsbuild03. |
The build has started for slc7_amd64_gcc10 in cmsbuild11. |
The build has started for cc8_aarch64_gcc9 in techlab-arm64-01-thunderx2-02a. |
The build has started for slc7_aarch64_gcc9 in techlab-arm64-01-thunderx2-02b. |
The build has started for cc8_ppc64le_gcc9 in ibmminsky-2b. |
The tests have finished for slc7_ppc64le_gcc9 Tests results: |
The tests have finished for slc7_aarch64_gcc9 Tests results: |
The was an error for slc7_amd64_gcc10. |
@smuzaffar @makortel There is a build error for slc7_amd64_gcc10, as reported by @perrotta in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/auto-build-release/CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3-slc7_amd64_gcc10/3176/LOGS/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3/log |
The build has finished sucessfully for the architecture cc8_ppc64le_gcc9 and is ready to be uploaded. |
The build has finished sucessfully for the architecture slc7_amd64_gcc900 and is ready to be uploaded. |
The tests have finished for cc8_ppc64le_gcc9 Tests results: |
The build has finished sucessfully for the architecture cc8_amd64_gcc9 and is ready to be uploaded. |
The tests have finished for slc7_amd64_gcc900 Tests results: |
The tests have finished for cc8_amd64_gcc9 Tests results: |
I'd think that since there has been no specific fix for the reported discrepancy in GEM plots (that seem more like red herring caused by non-gaussian fluctuations), strictly speaking we would not need a new validation campaign for gcc10. A counter-argument would be that lot's of other developments have been merged in between that have not been validated for gcc10. Counter-counter-argument would be that gcc10 will be implicitly re-validated when we switch to it for production. |
abort |
Thanks @makortel |
Deleting CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3:
You must create a new issue to start over the build. |
The was an error for cc8_aarch64_gcc9. |
That works of course too :) |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: