Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Track quality emulation and simulation features don't match #225

Open
cgsavard opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Track quality emulation and simulation features don't match #225

cgsavard opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cgsavard
Copy link

cgsavard commented Jul 6, 2023

I wanted to put this issue on everyone's radar, but I will work on fixing it.

The features listed here do not match the features being used by emulation here. This means that the TTTrack and TTTrack word MVA1 values don't match.

There are a few things that I think need to be done:

  1. Fix the features so that they match with the proper inputs to the new classifier.
  2. Have the features be set once and pull both TTTrack and TTTrack word to use the same features automatically, this way we won't have any differences. Ideally, the KFout module can also pull from the track quality config file to find out which features to use.
  3. Check the TTTrack and TTTrack word MVA1 variable against the python versions for validation that everything is working correctly
@cgsavard cgsavard self-assigned this Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant