We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor-nrepl/src/refactor_nrepl/ns/tracker.clj
Line 98 in 0a9a6ee
refactor-nrepl/src/refactor_nrepl/analyzer.clj
Lines 141 to 150 in 0a9a6ee
That's mostly desired behavior, since tools.analyzer only works for JVM Clojure.
However, we could also pick up .cljc files and tell tools.analyzer, if needed, to read them with :read-cond :allow :features #{:clj}.
:read-cond :allow :features #{:clj}
This would result in a more complete analysis which therefore would be less prone to errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
...I wrote something but deleted it.
Here goes a more accurate analysis:
slurp
tools.reader/read reader-opts
Line 94 in c1ff3fe
tools.reader/read
:features #{:clj
Sorry, something went wrong.
analyzer, tracker: also parse .cljc files
analyzer
tracker
5bf720e
Fixes #396 Closes #398
05485fb
No branches or pull requests
refactor-nrepl/src/refactor_nrepl/ns/tracker.clj
Line 98 in 0a9a6ee
refactor-nrepl/src/refactor_nrepl/analyzer.clj
Lines 141 to 150 in 0a9a6ee
That's mostly desired behavior, since tools.analyzer only works for JVM Clojure.
However, we could also pick up .cljc files and tell tools.analyzer, if needed, to read them with
:read-cond :allow :features #{:clj}
.This would result in a more complete analysis which therefore would be less prone to errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: