Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rethink consistency between latitudinal gradient, seasonality and monthly means #73

Open
znichollscr opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@znichollscr
Copy link
Contributor

As discovered in #71, there are times where our current techniques lead to latitudinal gradient and seasonality values which are bigger than the global-mean, which leads to negative values in the output. The solution in #71 is a workaround, shrinking the latitudinal gradient and seasonality until we don't get negative values.

A better solution would be to re-think how we calculate the latitudinal gradient and seasonality, to ensure that this sort of difference can't occur.

@znichollscr znichollscr added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant