You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first, thanks for the great work. This is a minor issue which i have encountered.
I have noticed that calling map_blocks between given dates/block numbers returns objects which are one block short of what is returned when calling for instance the range method with the same options. In particular it appears the map_blocks method skips the last block in the range. While this is easily amendable by adding one block to the end argument of map_blocks, it seems likely to cause confusion (or I might be confused).
Hi,
first, thanks for the great work. This is a minor issue which i have encountered.
I have noticed that calling map_blocks between given dates/block numbers returns objects which are one block short of what is returned when calling for instance the range method with the same options. In particular it appears the map_blocks method skips the last block in the range. While this is easily amendable by adding one block to the end argument of map_blocks, it seems likely to cause confusion (or I might be confused).
Reproduction Steps
System Information
Using AMI: no
BlockSci version: v0.7
Blockchain: Bitcoin
Parser: Disk
Total memory: 128 GB
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: