This page is to explain the conventions over Chron's labeling system.
Labels are split into several groups.
- 'A' group is used for code-review status and are applicable only to Pull Requests.
- 'F' group is used to encode the type (and accordingly the severity) of issues; they are applicable only within the Issue Tracker.
- 'M' group is to encode the affected feature in the product.
- 'P' group is to denote priority. They are generally relevant only to issues, though may in principle be used on pull-requests.
- 'Q' group is to denote difficulty, only used in issues.
- 'Z' group are reasons for why something is a non-issue. They are applicable only within the Issue Tracker.
As such, a pull request must have a single label from the 'A' group and may additionally have a single label from the 'P' group (though typically will not).
An valid issue must have a single label from the 'F' group and may additionally have a single label from the 'P' group. An invalid issue should be closed with a single label from the 'Z' group.
All pull requests should start labeled with either 'A0-pleasereview', 'A3-inprogress', or 'A2-insubstantial' (should it be an alteration which requires no code review). After review it should be relabeled with another 'A' group label.
A0-pleasereview
Pull request needs code review.A1-onice
Pull request is reviewed well, but should not yet be merged.A2-insubstantial
Pull request requires no code review (e.g. a sub-repository hash update).A3-inprogress
Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage.A4-gotissues
Pull request is reviewed and has significant issues which must be addressed. Once addressed, author should relabel asA0-pleasereview
.A8-looksgood
Pull request is reviewed well.A9-buythatmanabeer
Pull request is reviewed well and worth buying the author a beer.
Issues should have only one of these. Do not combine; if multiple labels are equally applicable to an issue, use the one with the lowest number.
F1-panic
The client panics and exits without proper error handling.F1-security
The client fails to follow expected, security-sensitive, behaviour.F2-bug
The client fails to follow expected behavior.F3-annoyance
The client behaves within expectations, however this "expected behaviour" itself is at issue. Annoyances are small enhancements which dramatically improve the usability of the client.F4-tests
Tests need fixing, improving or augmenting.F5-documentation
Documentation needs fixing, improving or augmenting.F6-refactor
Code needs refactoring.F7-footprint
An enhancement to provide a smaller (system load, memory, network or disk) footprint.F7-optimisation
An enhancement to provide better overall performance in terms of time-to-completion for a task.F8-enhancement
An additional feature.F9-proposal
A proposal of a feature or user story.
Used to denote the affected component or sub-project. Each issue and pull request should have (at least) one.
M0-interactivemap
The 4d interactive map.M1-factoids
Factoids and facts, from Wikidata and from our own database.M2-narratives
Narratives.M3-voting
Voting system on factoids to find their truth score.M4-weighing
Weighing system in the context of a user search or a narrative.M5-autonomylevel
Toggle to see administrative sub-units or groupments of political entities.M9-admininterface
A backend interface to create factoirs, narratives and other data.
Typically used only to annotate issues, however P0 and P2 may reasonably be used on PRs in exceptional circumstances.
P0-dropeverything
Everyone should address the issue/PR now.P2-asap
No need to stop dead in your tracks, however issue/PR should be addressed as soon as possible.P5-sometimesoon
Issue is worth doing soon.P7-nicetohave
Issue is worth doing eventually.P9-backlog
Issue is put in the product backlog, might be worth doing eventually.
Is used to annotate difficulty of issues.
Q0-trivial
Can be fixed by anyone with access to a computer.Q1-mentor
An easy task were a mentor is available. Please indicate in the issue who the mentor could be.Q2-easy
Can be fixed by copy and pasting from StackOverflow.Q5-substantial
Can be fixed by a developer with decent experience.Q7-involved
Can be fixed by a team of developers and probably takes some time.Q9-epic
Can only be fixed by John Skeet.
Used only on issues which will (or may, in the case of Z5) be closed immediately.
Z0-duplicate
Issue is a duplicate. Closer should comment with a link to the duplicate.Z0-intended
Issue describes a behavior which turns out to work as intended. Closer should explain why.Z0-invalid
Issue is invalid. Closer should comment why.Z0-question
Issue is a question. Closer should answer.Z0-stale
Issue is in principle valid, but it is not relevant anymore or can not reproduced.Z0-wontfix
Issue is in principle valid, but this project will not address it. Closer should explain why.Z5-unconfirmed
Issue might be valid, but it's not yet known.