Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Key/Value inconsistency when setting values from two different hosts #82

Open
mbentley opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@mbentley
Copy link

mbentley commented Dec 31, 2023

I am not sure if I am doing something unexpected but I have two clients and a self-hosted charm server. Everything seems to work as expected when I am only using one client but when I introduce a second client, things start to get out of sync if I initially set a value from one client and then later try to update the same key from the other. I am assuming that this workflow should work and I don't see why there would be a difference between using one client or many:

  1. Host 1 sets the value of foo to bar and list k/v to show it:
$ skate set foo bar
$ skate list
foo     bar
  1. Host 2 checks the k/v:
$ skate list
foo     bar
  1. Host 2 changes the value of foo to bar2:
$ skate set foo bar2
$ skate list
foo     bar2
  1. Host 1 performs a sync and then checks the list which should now show the updated value but doesn't:
$ skate sync
$ skate list
foo     bar

At this point, host 1 and host 2 are out of sync. If I perform a skate reset on both hosts, they both revert back to foo bar as the k/v.

I can see host 2 updating on the server side so I do not know why it seems to be out of sync and unable to be reconciled:

2023/12/31 19:16:06 <- POST /v1/fs/0777674bff03172294f90d5508e44052b9a175a040462fb6e567f5ddc00c9b66f2ea7737dcde/9aabe1cfed5709b1190d1910b41f302d7a4f?mode=432 192.168.0.150

My apologies that this isn't the best example and that I don't have much else in the way of logs but I am not really sure what will be helpful from a troubleshooting standpoint.

It seems that if I do a delete and then a set, the updates work as expected so it seems that just doing a set when there is an existing key value set does not work as I would expect to just update the value.

@flippedcracker
Copy link

I'm seeing the same issue.

@HoboDev
Copy link

HoboDev commented Jun 11, 2024

You should be able to circumvent this by deleting the key first and then setting it again with the new value.
It's a bit nasty but seems to work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants