Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Amending the GitHub README to reflect mailing list status #473

Closed
divya-mohan0209 opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Amending the GitHub README to reflect mailing list status #473

divya-mohan0209 opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
?: needs triage Metadata needs to be triaged and updated

Comments

@divya-mohan0209
Copy link

Summary

I was trying to sign up for the Chaoss DEI WG mailing list linked in the README. This doesn't seem to exist anymore on the LF lists.

Background

I was trying to sign up for the Chaoss DEI WG mailing list linked in the README. This doesn't seem to exist anymore on the LF lists. It could cause confusion for people looking to sign up. Additionally, I also noticed that on the KB page, the mailing list seems to have been struck off.

Details

Modifying the GitHub README to either reflect the strike off or removing the entry completely would be the best way forward. However, since I'm relatively new I am unsure of the exact specifics of what could be implemented.

Outcome

Better clarity for newcomers like myself, I guess?

@divya-mohan0209 divya-mohan0209 added the ?: needs triage Metadata needs to be triaged and updated label Feb 19, 2023
@germonprez
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for this issue @divya-mohan0209

Looking a bit more, @ElizabethN -- I'd suggest that we put the DEI README on this week's agenda. I think the entire thing could use a little attention.

@divya-mohan0209
Copy link
Author

I won't be able to attend the meeting, since it's at a very inconvenient hour for me. However, I can check the notes & work on revamping the DEI README if a consensus is reached.

@germonprez
Copy link
Contributor

No problem! We will talk about it there and then update this issue and respond in Slack as well.

@ElizabethN
Copy link
Member

This reference has been removed, thanks @divya-mohan0209! Sorry for not updating this issue sooner!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
?: needs triage Metadata needs to be triaged and updated
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants