Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revising Metric: Code of Conduct at Event #430

Closed
1 of 19 tasks
germonprez opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 19 tasks

Revising Metric: Code of Conduct at Event #430

germonprez opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
I: good first issue Good for newcomers I: help wanted Extra attention is needed T: revising metric Previously released metric that is being revisited and updated

Comments

@germonprez
Copy link
Contributor

germonprez commented Apr 19, 2022

Name of the Metric Being Revised

Code of Conduct at Event
https://chaoss.community/metric-code-of-conduct-at-event/

Submit PRs to this document: https://github.com/chaoss/wg-dei/blob/main/focus-areas/event-diversity/event-code-of-conduct.md

Link to Original Metric Release Issue

#184

Specific Metric Details that Require Attention

  • Revisit the formatting in the Data Collection Strategies
  • Neither of the references are pointing to live sites
  • Check out the remarks in the tracking spreadsheet
  • Add date of last review
  • Change filename to match the name of the metric (code-of-conduct-at-event.md)

Checklist

Process

  • Create the “revising metric” labeled issue in the authoring WG’s repo for comments during review period
  • Create pull request of revised metric to WG’s repo (after checking Content Quality and Technical Requirements below)
  • Add the metric revision to release notes issue in working group repo
  • Update the Metrics Spreadsheet to indicate that the revised metric is under review
  • Create issue in CHAOSS/Translations repository to kick-off translation to other languages (please use the the translation issue template)
  • "Metric Candidate Release" label added to the metric release candidate issue when fully ready fo release

When above steps are completed:

  • Announce new/updated metric on mailing list, newsletter, community Zoom call, and Twitter. This can be coordinated with the community manager and can be done as a collective of all revised metrics from the CHAOSS community.

Content Quality (check all that apply)

  • Date of last review has been added to the revised metric at the bottom of the markdown file (month/year)
  • Formatting changes have been made
  • Minor editorial changes have been made
  • Major editorial changes have been made
  • Metric adheres to the current metrics template
  • Metric name has changed and necessary updates are made to the WG README table and metrics tracking spreadsheet

Technical Requirements for any Revisions

  • Metric file name is the full metric name and only contains lower case letters and hyphens (“-”) for spaces
  • Images are included using markdown and absolute path links (as described in the metrics template)
  • Images have at least one empty line above and below them
  • Images are placed in image folder and followed naming convention
  • If new a focus area is created, ensure focus area is added to wg repo readme and focus area folder readme
  • There is no HTML code in the metrics markdown file
@germonprez germonprez added the T: revising metric Previously released metric that is being revisited and updated label Apr 19, 2022
@germonprez germonprez changed the title Revising: Code of Conduct at Event Revising Metric: Code of Conduct at Event Apr 20, 2022
@jwflory jwflory added I: good first issue Good for newcomers I: help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Apr 27, 2022
@TejasMate
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @germonprez, one of the reference Women In Tech Manifesto, not pointing anywhere. I try to find on their website, didn't get code of conduct page.

Need to review this

@klumb
Copy link
Member

klumb commented Jun 2, 2022

Removing the women in tech manifesto reference

The site doesn't appear to exist anymore

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I: good first issue Good for newcomers I: help wanted Extra attention is needed T: revising metric Previously released metric that is being revisited and updated
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants