From c9e4516644dc4b17d30bb8d9c4c91d3de9403c80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: c-node Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:34:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update sovereign rollups-misconceptions of sovereign rollups.md --- .../sovereign rollups-misconceptions of sovereign rollups.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pages/markdown-pages/learn/sovereign rollups-misconceptions of sovereign rollups.md b/src/pages/markdown-pages/learn/sovereign rollups-misconceptions of sovereign rollups.md index fedaa9d2d..c09f7b0f5 100644 --- a/src/pages/markdown-pages/learn/sovereign rollups-misconceptions of sovereign rollups.md +++ b/src/pages/markdown-pages/learn/sovereign rollups-misconceptions of sovereign rollups.md @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ There’s two main ways censorship resistance can come from the DA layer: #### Sovereign rollups lack bridging options The native bridges of smart contract rollups have trust-minimized security because the settlement layer verifies the rollup’s entire block. Sovereign rollups can’t bridge to the DA layer if it doesn’t verify its transactions, right? -Sovereign rollups can have a bridge with their DA layer. If the DA layer supports smart contracts, the bridge can be trust-minimized. If there is no smart contract support, like with Celestia, then the bridge would require stronger trust assumptions. +Sovereign rollups can have a bridge with their DA layer. If the DA layer supports smart contracts, the bridge can be trust-minimized, although the bridge may require governance for the rollup to preserve sovereignty. If there is no smart contract support, like with Celestia, then the bridge would require stronger trust assumptions. Importantly, sovereign rollups can have bridges between each other. These bridges can be trust-minimized if both sovereign rollups use the same DA layer and have fraud or validity proofs. This is possible through light clients that verify proofs of bridged transactions.