-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ingress, catalogue relations to terraform modules #245
Comments
This could have been happening because the |
Why do we want to have tempo? It has no UI. Mimir potentially makes sense, but I'd honestly skip it. I'm sure I've asked for this at some point, but I think we can skip this. |
@simskij @sed-i canonical/tempo-coordinator-k8s-operator#93 added some form of that for Tempo. Mimir has the same one, while Loki has a "simpler" UI not for the generic memberlist, but for the distributor ring: Another alternative, as we discussed in a separate meeting, is to add an empty link, explaining the lack of UI in the catalogue item description. How do we want to do this? |
We're gonna go for the empty links for now, for both Mimir and Loki, and eventually change it in the future! |
We need to have mimir, tempo listed on the catalogue page.
Depends on:
catalogue
relation cos-lib#113This would involve adding ingress relations to mimir, tempo, as they are currently missing from the terraform module.
This may be a bit involved: after manually relating mimir to traefik, I am getting a 404 from nginx for all mimir endpoints.
References:
catalogue
+ingress
tempo integrations in COS TF module #253The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: