Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need support #46

Closed
psidana1983 opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Need support #46

psidana1983 opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@psidana1983
Copy link

Hi Team ,
Can you please help me to understand what is the significance of the request fields

  • ipv6Addr
  • ipv4
  • external Id

I understand that these are the mandatory request parameter but we don't understand why it is required.
I checked with my team and as per the feedback we can fetch the details based on mobile number itself . So want to understand if it is mandatory to implement it and how does the response change based on these fields.

@eric-murray
Copy link
Collaborator

@psidana1983
The UeId schema is currently defined as:

    UeId:
      description: User equipment identifier
      type: object
      properties:
        externalId:
          $ref: '#/components/schemas/ExternalId'
        msisdn:
          $ref: '#/components/schemas/MSISDN'
        ipv4Addr:
          $ref: '#/components/schemas/Ipv4Addr'
        ipv6Addr:
          $ref: '#/components/schemas/Ipv6Addr'
      minProperties: 1

So only one of these parameters is required. If you have msisdn (i.e. the mobile phone number), then that is all that is required.

Note that the current API definition is pre-release, and this schema will be updated in the not too distant future following changes likely to be approved within other CAMARA sub-projects.

@eric-murray
Copy link
Collaborator

I am converting this issue to a discussion in case any further discussion is required

@camaraproject camaraproject locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2023
@eric-murray eric-murray converted this issue into discussion #48 May 15, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants