Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split componentize and transpile #500

Open
blaine-arcjet opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Split componentize and transpile #500

blaine-arcjet opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@blaine-arcjet
Copy link
Contributor

A lot of work is currently going into the "componentize" logic of jco; however, this means it is taking on a ton of dependencies.

If users, such as arcjet, only want to transpile, they should not have to take on this supply chain risk.

@guybedford
Copy link
Collaborator

We're in the process of discussing where ComponentizeJS best belongs, and currently it's an open question and has been considered on both sides for either moving ComponentizeJS into Jco or moving ComponentizeJS into StarlingMonkey.

This is a good datapoint to hear on the side of moving it into StarlingMonkey and I'll be sure to bring this argument up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants