-
Determine what data will be cached.
-
Determine what data will be cached. It is commonly recommended to use the Executor concept that represents a junction of the executable code, usually JIT generated kernel, with some precomputed algorithm parameters.
-
Provide a key that uniquely identifies the cached value as a function of dynamically changing parameters, that is, shapes, dynamic input that determines the algorithm parameters, etc. To be used in a hash table, the key must have the following static interface:
struct KeyType { size_t hash() const; bool operator== () const; };
-
Provide a builder, that is, a callable object of the following signature:
ValueType build(const KeyType& key);
The
ValueType
is a type to be cached (for example, a shared pointer to Executor object). Remember that in the current cache implementation, a default constructedValueType()
object is considered empty. Therefore, it is better to usestd::shared_ptr
as theValueType
. The builder instantiates a specific type of cached entity from thekey
, so thekey
completely defines the cached data. The builder is used to create theValueType
object in case of a cache miss. -
Refactor the specific implementation of the
prepareParams()
method to extract the cached object construction logic (for example, the algorithm parameters recalculation and JIT kernel generation) into the builder. -
Add the key generation code into the
prepareParams()
method to query the cache. -
Implement cache usage as follows:
void preapareParams() override { ... //code that prepares parameters for the key //key instantiation KeyType key = {param1, param2, ...}; // get a reference to the cache auto cache = getRuntimeCache(); //query cahce, buildExecutor is the builder descibed in 3 auto result = cache->getOrCreate(key, buildExecutor); // get the the cached value, in this example it is a pointer to an executor execPtr = result.first; }
-
To provide smoke testing of these changes, add repeated shapes to the "target shapes" part of the corresponding single layer test definition:
{ //dynamic case description each pair per each input has {{dynamic shape}, {{static shape case1}, {static shape case2}, ...} {{-1, -1, -1}, {{10, 10, 10}, {5, 5, 5}, {10, 10, 10}}}, // input 0 {{-1, -1, 5}, {{10, 10, 5}, {5, 5, 5}, {10, 10, 5}}} // input 1 },
Note that placing two identical target shapes one after another does not trigger the cache, since another optimization based on the fact that the shapes have not been changed takes place. For example, the following test definition does not properly test the cache:
{ // the shape infer and params preparation stages will be skipped for the second target shapes combination since the shapes are not changed {{-1, -1, -1}, {{5, 5, 5}, {5, 5, 5}}}, // input 0 {{-1, -1, 5}, {{5, 5, 5}, {5, 5, 5}}} // input 1 },