We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The current API for defining custom constructors, exposed as arguments to tyro.conf.arg() and tyro.conf.subcommand(), is overly limiting.
tyro.conf.arg()
tyro.conf.subcommand()
This may take a while, but we can make this much more flexible. Roadmap:
PrimitiveConstructorSpec
StructConstructorSpec
Relevant issues: #23, #177, #185, #186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
done via #189 #191 #194 #201!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The current API for defining custom constructors, exposed as arguments to
tyro.conf.arg()
andtyro.conf.subcommand()
, is overly limiting.This may take a while, but we can make this much more flexible. Roadmap:
PrimitiveConstructorSpec
, which defines the behavior of types that can be instantiated from a single command-line argument.StructConstructorSpec
, which defines the behavior of types that can be broken down into multiple arguments.Relevant issues: #23, #177, #185, #186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: