Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

@addcommand/noeval [REF: Job 96] #9

Open
brazilofmux opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

@addcommand/noeval [REF: Job 96] #9

brazilofmux opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone-2.9A Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement

Comments

@brazilofmux
Copy link
Owner

Original issue 6 created by brazilofmux on 2006-09-08T20:47:27.000Z:

On Tue Jul 20 17:01:58 2004, Ian suggested:

Add a 'noeval' switch to @addcommand (mirroring @command/add/noeval).
Noeval causes arguments passed to it to be unevaluated.

[REF: Job 96]
@brazilofmux
Copy link
Owner Author

Comment #1 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2006-11-28T04:39:09.000Z:

<empty>

@brazilofmux
Copy link
Owner Author

Comment #2 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2006-11-28T04:39:38.000Z:

<empty>

@brazilofmux
Copy link
Owner Author

Comment #3 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2006-11-29T05:11:34.000Z:

<empty>

@brazilofmux
Copy link
Owner Author

Comment #4 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2007-12-18T03:53:21.000Z:

<empty>

@brazilofmux
Copy link
Owner Author

Comment #5 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2009-11-29T15:58:14.000Z:

<empty>

@emurphy42 emurphy42 mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2018
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Milestone-2.9A Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@brazilofmux