Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please clarify scope of this repository #376

Closed
rickardp opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Please clarify scope of this repository #376

rickardp opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@rickardp
Copy link
Contributor

rickardp commented May 9, 2023

I just noticed that all the portability PRs were closed and the main branch was forced pushed to some other branch yesterday. @TimDettmers From issue #252:

[...] It would be good to hear from the maintainers that they are at all interested in making this package cross-platform. It is very much CUDA focused at the moment.

It seems there are a few possible contributors who could help with ensuring portability, but I believe @TimDettmers you are the sole maintainer of this repository and it is your decision how portable you want this library to be. I take the closing of the PRs as kind of statement you are not interested in supporting Windows/macOS here (as well as no AMD GPUs etc)? If you find some time, maybe just clarifying this would be good.

As a person who is interested in the portable version of the code, I would obviously prefer it we could collaborate on a port here, but if you are not interested it is totally understandable, and I'll just go ahead breaking out the stuff I need to a new library and porting it to M1 (which I already started BTW). @TheStoneMX, @acpopescu and others if you are interested on collaborating on this I'm very open to this, just know it's not my day job to work with this :)

@AiswaryaSrinivas
Copy link

Hi @rickardp , Just wanted to check, if a library that supports macOs would be released any time soon?? It would be great to have support for Apple Silicon

@deep-pipeline
Copy link

@TimDettmers just a quick request if you might answer @rickardp message above from a month ago please.

As an onlooker, exploring the repository to find out what the situation is w.r.t. Apple Silicon support, I too am surprised by the closure, without comment, of the portability PR #252 offered by a contributor and wonder if you might make a formal comment please here so anyone finding this comment thread knows your views explicitly.

Thanks in advance.

Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants