Add ICD11 as a prefix for Disease

[gaurav]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Biolink Model supports ICD9 and ICD10 as prefixes for Disease:

biolink-model/biolink-model.yaml

Lines 8136 to 8186 in a2ec41e

	disease:
	aliases: ['condition', 'disorder', 'medical condition']
	description: >-
	A disorder of structure or function, especially one that produces specific
	signs, phenotypes or symptoms or that affects a specific location and is not simply a
	direct result of physical injury. A disposition to undergo pathological processes that exists in an
	organism because of one or more disorders in that organism.
	is_a: disease or phenotypic feature
	exact_mappings:
	- MONDO:0000001
	- DOID:4
	- NCIT:C2991
	- WIKIDATA:Q12136
	- SIO:010299
	- UMLSSG:DISO
	- STY:T047
	- dcid:Disease
	narrow_mappings:
	- STY:T019
	# Acquired Abnormality
	- STY:T020
	# Mental or behavioral disfunction
	- STY:T048
	# (Cell or Molecular Dysfunction)
	- STY:T049
	# (Neoplastic Process)
	- STY:T191
	# disease susceptibility
	- MONDO:0042489
	id_prefixes:
	- MONDO
	- DOID
	- OMIM
	- OMIM.PS
	- orphanet
	- EFO
	- UMLS
	- MESH
	- MEDDRA
	- NCIT
	- SNOMEDCT
	- medgen
	- ICD10
	- ICD9
	- KEGG.DISEASE ## H number
	- HP
	- MP
	- PHARMGKB.DISEASE
	in_subset:
	- model_organism_database
	- translator_minimal

We should also support ICD11, which came out in Nov 2021. NodeNorm would like to add support for ICD11 mappings, but this would require ICD11 becoming an allowed prefix in the Biolink Model.

What working group (or team) did this request originate from?
NodeNorm (Translator SRI)

Note: This is relevant for members of NCATS Translator.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add ICD11 as a prefix for Disease (presumably just above ICD10).

Additional information to support this request (optional)
N/A

Tag relevant members for discussion
@sierra-moxon

[gaurav]

Note that other Monarch Initiative projects use the prefix icd11.foundation: and define it as either http://id.who.int/icd/entity/ as in monarch-initiative/icd11 or http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/mondo/sources/icd11foundation/ as in MONDO.

[sierra-moxon]

bioregistry defines icd11 as the prefix/namespace for this. It also defines an alternate prefix of ICD-11. There is some desire from Monarch folks to get icd11.foundation into bioregistry but it is not yet clear if this will be a prefix alias for the existing icd11 prefix or a new prefix (this resource has a lot of linearizations).

@gaurav - which resources are you consuming with this set of cross references? Primarily MONDO?

[gaurav]

Yup, primarily MONDO! I'm happy to translator icd11.foundation to icd11 during ingest into NodeNorm if that would preserve the IRI.

[colleenXu]

@sierra-moxon @kevinschaper

I saw the release candidate and there's an inconsistency in the format of "ICD11". At the top (line 80), the format is all-lowercase icd11. In the Disease prefixes (line 8215?), the format is all upper-case ICD11.

Note: if the desired format is icd11, I find it odd that the others have all-caps format ICD9 and ICD10.

[sierra-moxon]

Hi @colleenXu - yes, I agree, it is inconsistent. We're in the middle of trying to reconcile all of this with bioregistry, bioportal, and linkml/prefixmaps. I hope by the time this all gets done in those repos, that we'll have a capitalized version of the prefix to match the others, but I wanted to get a "stop-gap" prefix in place in the meantime as this kind of work often takes awhile.

[colleenXu]

So in the meantime...should the release candidate be consistent in all lower-case or all-caps?