You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're developing a UI to allow the creation of fully-qualified statements using associations and noticed during the process that there doesn't seem to be a way to tell which part of the statement a qualifier applies to. We'd like to be able to know this to co-locate the qualifiers in the UI with the part of the statement they describe. The model already defines the type of the qualifier with the normal is_a hierarchy, so I'm not sure if the best method is another slot like defines or applies_to:
Or maybe there's another way to do this that's easier. I think we only need to differentiate between "subject", "object", and "statement" qualifiers (I believe predicate qualifiers will always be qualified predicate but I may be wrong).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're developing a UI to allow the creation of fully-qualified statements using associations and noticed during the process that there doesn't seem to be a way to tell which part of the statement a qualifier applies to. We'd like to be able to know this to co-locate the qualifiers in the UI with the part of the statement they describe. The model already defines the type of the qualifier with the normal
is_a
hierarchy, so I'm not sure if the best method is another slot likedefines
orapplies_to
:subject context qualifier: is_a: context qualifier + applies_to: subject in_subset: - translator_minimal
Or if it's better to have some abstract qualifiers that can be mixed in:
Or maybe there's another way to do this that's easier. I think we only need to differentiate between "subject", "object", and "statement" qualifiers (I believe predicate qualifiers will always be
qualified predicate
but I may be wrong).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: