You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I can tell, it seems that “folder” and “directory” are used pretty interchangeably in the specification — with “directory” occurring slightly more often, but “folder” present in more prominent places:
chymera@decohost ~/src/bids-specification $ ag directory -o | wc -l
179
chymera@decohost ~/src/bids-specification $ ag folder -o | wc -l
148
In the interest of consistency should we maybe standardize the wording to always be directory?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That said, I am pretty sure that for almost all cases in our spec, the respective authors did not think about this difference between "folder" and "directory" and indeed just used them interchangeably. I think I am therefore slightly in favor of just using "directory" (at least until we find a good case where we definitely should use "folder").
@sappelhoff I don't think we would be losing any precision, if anything, the folder notion obscures the underlying structure, which is precisely what we're trying to accurately document.
As far as I can tell, it seems that “folder” and “directory” are used pretty interchangeably in the specification — with “directory” occurring slightly more often, but “folder” present in more prominent places:
In the interest of consistency should we maybe standardize the wording to always be directory?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: