Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

See if we can simply listFormulaIsEmpty() with introduction of undef #1185

Open
lochana-chathura opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

See if we can simply listFormulaIsEmpty() with introduction of undef #1185

lochana-chathura opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
semtype Relates to types module Type/Improvement

Comments

@lochana-chathura
Copy link
Member

Description:
With the introduction of undef type to the type engine, we were able to simplify the mappingFormulaIsEmpty() logic and make it aligned with the algorithm in exercise 10 of the Cov-Contra paper. Changes are made with PR #1175.

Similarly, see if we can achieve the same with listFormulaIsEmpty().
@lochana-chathura lochana-chathura added the semtype Relates to types module label Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
semtype Relates to types module Type/Improvement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@heshanpadmasiri @lochana-chathura