Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cloudwatch): throw ValidationErrors instead of untyped Errors #33456

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

Issue

Relates to #32569

Description of changes

ValidationErrors everywhere

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

n/a

Description of how you validated changes

Existing tests. Exemptions granted as this is a refactor of existing code.

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team February 14, 2025 21:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Feb 14, 2025
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Feb 14, 2025
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ export class Metric implements IMetric {
public toAlarmConfig(): MetricAlarmConfig {
const metricConfig = this.toMetricConfig();
if (metricConfig.metricStat === undefined) {
throw new Error('Using a math expression is not supported here. Pass a \'Metric\' object instead');
throw new cdk.UnscopedValidationError('Using a math expression is not supported here. Pass a \'Metric\' object instead');
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these are all unscoped because Metric isn't a Construct. We'd have to send in scope: Construct as a property to all metrics everywhere to get this to be scoped

Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(This review is outdated)

@kaizencc kaizencc added pr-linter/exempt-readme The PR linter will not require README changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes labels Feb 17, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review February 17, 2025 15:31

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.00%. Comparing base (50b9b6f) to head (8dea6ac).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #33456   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.00%   81.00%           
=======================================
  Files         238      238           
  Lines       14271    14271           
  Branches     2492     2492           
=======================================
  Hits        11560    11560           
  Misses       2425     2425           
  Partials      286      286           
Flag Coverage Δ
suite.unit 81.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk 79.92% <ø> (ø)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core 82.16% <ø> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 17, 2025

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: pull request branch update failed.

The pull request can't be updated

You should look at the reason for the failure and decide if the pull request needs to be fixed or if you want to requeue it.

If you want to requeue this pull request, you need to post a comment with the text: @mergifyio requeue

@kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio requeue

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 17, 2025

requeue

❌ This pull request head commit has not been previously disembarked from queue.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 8dea6ac
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 6098816 into main Feb 17, 2025
20 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the conroy/cw branch February 17, 2025 17:49
Copy link

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes pr-linter/exempt-readme The PR linter will not require README changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants