feat: metadata collection for construct methods

[GavinZZ]

Issue # (if applicable)

N/A

Reason for this change

Support construct public method logging. Method name, keys, and property values of Boolean and ENUM types - When you use an L2 construct method, we will collect the method name, property keys, and property values of Boolean and enum types.

Description of changes

Based on the discussion #33198. This change adds @MetadataMethod decorator to public construct methods which will allow metadata logging during synthesis into AWS::CDK::Metadata resource.

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

N/A

Description of how you validated changes

No integ test is possible as integ test requires analytics reporting to be false. Unit tests added.

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Manual changes to the classes.ts file are not allowed.
❌ Manual changes to the enums.ts file are not allowed.

If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification. A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed, add Clarification Request to a comment.

✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.

[GavinZZ]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Manual changes to the classes.ts file are not allowed.
❌ Manual changes to the enums.ts file are not allowed.

If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification. A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed, add Clarification Request to a comment.

This PR added a label to allow exempt but will not take effect until this PR is merged. Will ignore this check.

> ❌ Manual changes to the classes.ts file are not allowed.
> ❌ Manual changes to the enums.ts file are not allowed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.47619% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.83%. Comparing base (3403da4) to head (255a3a9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (90.47%) is below the target coverage (95.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #33292      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.80%   80.83%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         236      236              
  Lines       14235    14253      +18     
  Branches     2487     2490       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        11503    11522      +19     
+ Misses       2448     2446       -2     
- Partials      284      285       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
suite.unit	80.83% <90.47%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk	79.57% <ø> (ø)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core	82.20% <90.47%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

[paulhcsun]

Nice work! Changes look good to me, approving and adding the do-not-merge label for now which can be removed after the test is added.

[godwingrs22]

Thanks @GavinZZ for this change. LGTM overall. Just a minor comment for clarification.

exempt

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Manual changes to the classes.ts file are not allowed.
❌ Manual changes to the enums.ts file are not allowed.

If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification. A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed, add Clarification Request to a comment.

✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.

[GavinZZ]

@Mergifyio requeue

[GavinZZ]

Going to manually override and merge this PR as this PR will always fail due to manual changes to classes.ts and enums.ts file. I added PR linter which will take effective after this is merged.

[mergify]

requeue

✅ The queue state of this pull request has been cleaned. It can be re-embarked automatically

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 255a3a9
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[GavinZZ]

@mergify requeue

[mergify]

requeue

☑️ This pull request is already queued

[github-actions]

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.