-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(appsync): source api association does not depend on schema #29455
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
Exemption Request: This change could be covered by unit tests and the existing integ tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 👍🏼 Just a few comments about adding comments.
@msambol |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks @go-to-k
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Mergifyio update |
✅ Branch has been successfully updated |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Issue # (if applicable)
Closes #29044.
Reason for this change
When associating between the source GraphQL API and the merged API using
fromSourceApis
, generated association resource doesn't depend on the source GraphQL schema.The same is true if the
SourceApiAssociation
construct is used explicitly.Description of changes
The
sourceApi
passed by thefromSourceApis
method or theSourceApiAssociation
construct hasaddSchemaDependency
method. Using this method, we can make the association to depend on the schema in thesourceApi
.But, if the api is an IMPORTED resource to begin with, it has no schema in the CDK layer, so there is nothing we can do about it. (The method does nothing.)
Description of how you validated changes
Both unit and existing integ tests.
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license