Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: New Data Masking utitlity #3488

Closed
1 task done
leandrodamascena opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3186
Closed
1 task done

Docs: New Data Masking utitlity #3488

leandrodamascena opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3186
Assignees
Labels
data-masking Sensitive Data Masking feature documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor

What were you searching in the docs?

How to use the new Data Masking utility

Is this related to an existing documentation section?

No response

How can we improve?

Creating the documentation

Got a suggestion in mind?

No response

Acknowledgment

  • I understand the final update might be different from my proposed suggestion, or refused.
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation triage Pending triage from maintainers labels Dec 11, 2023
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena linked a pull request Dec 11, 2023 that will close this issue
7 tasks
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena added the data-masking Sensitive Data Masking feature label Dec 12, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa removed the triage Pending triage from maintainers label Dec 18, 2023
@heitorlessa heitorlessa assigned heitorlessa and unassigned seshubaws Dec 18, 2023
@leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor Author

Python layer:

Compressed:
Current size: 5MB
Building with aws-encryption-sdk + cryptography: 9-10MB

Uncompressed
Current size: 12MB
Building with aws-encryption-sdk + cryptography: ~ 29MB

We have little difference in ColdStart using the layer with and without aws-encryption-sdk, just few ms, even importing the AWSEncryptionSDKProvider + DataMasking. But of course, the first execution of encrypt or decrypt takes 3x times than the second using the same Lambda. Most of this time is calling KMS + Creating cache + caching python libraries.

Executions:

First encrypt execution (coldstart) - 128MB - 3.5s
Second and subsequent encryption executions (warm) - 128MB - 1.0s (edited)

First encrypt execution (coldstart) - 1024MB - 450ms
Second and subsequent encryption executions (warm) - 1024MB - 140ms (edited)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

This issue is now closed. Please be mindful that future comments are hard for our team to see.

If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.

If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pending-release Fix or implementation already in dev waiting to be released label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2024

This is now released under 2.33.0 version!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the pending-release Fix or implementation already in dev waiting to be released label Feb 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data-masking Sensitive Data Masking feature documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Status: Shipped
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants