We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To support certain partners or types where an Organization::Service::Resource namespace is hard to fulfil. Simple example; AWS::::Account
AWS::::Account
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like this explanation provided by @chgeorgeamzn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOrgLj9lOwk
Sorry, something went wrong.
While custom resources have unfortunately already broken this assumption, I think it'd be simpler to avoid expanding to allow more uncommon unexpected resource type name patterns, especially since CloudFormation template recognition frequently relies on resource type patterns since AWSTemplateFormatVersion is optional: aws-cloudformation/cfn-lint#1171, aws-cloudformation/cfn-lint-visual-studio-code#99, aws/aws-toolkit-jetbrains#1715 (comment), https://github.com/github/super-linter/pull/231#discussion_r445708695, mwpearce/vscode-cfn-nag#6, joenye/coc-cfn-lint#3 (comment), aws-cloudformation/cfn-lint-atom#29
AWSTemplateFormatVersion
The public AWS::::Account resource type will likely just be AWS::Organizations::Account
AWS::Organizations::Account
Some other resource types might be a bit more odd, but we should be able to find something suitable for them
No branches or pull requests
To support certain partners or types where an Organization::Service::Resource namespace is hard to fulfil. Simple example;
AWS::::Account
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: