Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow type name to include only 2 tokens #7

Closed
rjlohan opened this issue Apr 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Allow type name to include only 2 tokens #7

rjlohan opened this issue Apr 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rjlohan
Copy link
Contributor

rjlohan commented Apr 19, 2019

To support certain partners or types where an Organization::Service::Resource namespace is hard to fulfil. Simple example; AWS::::Account

@rjlohan rjlohan added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 19, 2019
@rjlohan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjlohan commented Jun 12, 2019

I like this explanation provided by @chgeorgeamzn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOrgLj9lOwk

@PatMyron
Copy link
Contributor

PatMyron commented Sep 1, 2020

While custom resources have unfortunately already broken this assumption, I think it'd be simpler to avoid expanding to allow more uncommon unexpected resource type name patterns, especially since CloudFormation template recognition frequently relies on resource type patterns since AWSTemplateFormatVersion is optional: aws-cloudformation/cfn-lint#1171, aws-cloudformation/cfn-lint-visual-studio-code#99, aws/aws-toolkit-jetbrains#1715 (comment), https://github.com/github/super-linter/pull/231#discussion_r445708695, mwpearce/vscode-cfn-nag#6, joenye/coc-cfn-lint#3 (comment), aws-cloudformation/cfn-lint-atom#29

The public AWS::::Account resource type will likely just be AWS::Organizations::Account

Some other resource types might be a bit more odd, but we should be able to find something suitable for them

@PatMyron PatMyron closed this as completed Sep 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants