Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link Filters #65

Open
1 of 3 tasks
tangjeff0 opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Link Filters #65

tangjeff0 opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
d/hard difficulty epic issue that collects multiple other issues t/feature

Comments

@tangjeff0
Copy link
Collaborator

tangjeff0 commented May 15, 2020

Link Filter

Locations

Original Post

Click to open

Design

Screen Shot 2020-06-27 at 11 06 28 AM

06-28-2020

#185 #186 #189 implements the following screenshot (demo). Next steps are to implement actual link parsing at the page-level, and then only include/exclude blocks based on those filters.

05-15-2020

After a certain number of links, it's quite difficult to manage all the filters. I believe some Roam users are now using {{query}}s to achieve a similar goal of filtering information.

The design space is likewise broad as in #26: What is the actual user goal and what might be some various solutions?

Screen Shot 2020-05-15 at 7 38 47 PM

@jacobmorse

This comment has been minimized.

@tangjeff0 tangjeff0 changed the title Re-design Link Filter Link Filter May 27, 2020
@tangjeff0 tangjeff0 changed the title Link Filter Link Filters Jul 4, 2020
This was referenced Jul 4, 2020
@tangjeff0 tangjeff0 reopened this Dec 30, 2020
@tangjeff0 tangjeff0 added d/hard difficulty and removed design: ✅ labels Feb 3, 2021
This was referenced Mar 17, 2021
@avidrucker avidrucker added the epic issue that collects multiple other issues label Apr 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
d/hard difficulty epic issue that collects multiple other issues t/feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants