Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

example_emr_eks_pi_job failed with airflow issues 31322 RC providers #1122

Closed
Lee-W opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

example_emr_eks_pi_job failed with airflow issues 31322 RC providers #1122

Lee-W opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Lee-W
Copy link
Contributor

Lee-W commented May 22, 2023

Describe the bug
create_eks_cluster_kube_namespace_with_role failed when testing example_emr_eks_pi_job with the latest RC2 providers in apache/airflow#31322.

To Reproduce

  1. Update the provider version to the ones in Status of testing Providers that were prepared on May 19, 2023 apache/airflow#31322

Expected behavior
DAG finishes without failure

Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

Additional context

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/airflow/operators/bash.py", line 210, in execute
    raise AirflowException(
airflow.exceptions.AirflowException: Bash command failed. The command returned a non-zero exit code 1.
@Lee-W Lee-W added the bug Something isn't working label May 22, 2023
@Lee-W Lee-W self-assigned this May 22, 2023
@Lee-W
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lee-W commented May 24, 2023

Close as this has been resolved

@Lee-W Lee-W closed this as completed May 24, 2023
@pankajkoti
Copy link
Collaborator

How was this resolved? Can we add a comment pointing to the PR if we changed some code. I remember we've a PR in apache/airflow trying to resolve this, but is #1140 a resolution on our end and hence, we're closing this?

@Lee-W
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lee-W commented May 24, 2023

This one is related to the VPC cleanup. We solved it together yesterday. #1140 relates to #1120 #1121 #1123 instead

@pankajkoti
Copy link
Collaborator

okay, understood 👍🏽 . Looking at the PR title, description or the closing comment did not give a hint for this. Thank you for clarifying!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants