DOC202 false positive with abstract methods

[MichaReiser]

I really like these new rules, they provide a lot of extra guardrails for docstrings!

When trying to start using rule DOC202 I ran into a bug. When defining an abstract method, the rule raises an error, because nothing is returned (which makes sense, since it's an empty method, the real code is in the subclasses).

As a small example, an error is raised for this method:

    @property
    @abc.abstractmethod
    def realised_prices(self) -> pd.DataFrame:
        """
        The realised prices of the market.

        Returns:
            The realised prices as a DataFrame
        """

Originally posted by @RubenVanEldik in #12434 (comment)

[MichaReiser]

This should be resolved by #12771 We plan to get a release out today or tomorrow

[RubenVanEldik]

Sorry, I missed the PR that solved this issue, absolutely amazing work!! ❤️❤️❤️