Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: There is a PIM error in METS in qa/1.x (1.10 candidates) Document does not conform to PREMIS in METS best practice #632

Closed
ross-spencer opened this issue Apr 8, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@ross-spencer
Copy link
Contributor

ross-spencer commented Apr 8, 2019

Expected behaviour

PIM warnings/errors are happening for certain transfers:

image

Current behaviour

Ingesting various transfers with images or media, e.g. mp3, and with settings in Archivematica for normalization for preservation and access and policy checks (most of the settings to enhance an AIP on) will generate a METS with long lines that haven't been separated through the normal process of pretty printing.

Steps to reproduce

You can run three specific folders in the sample data nb. as transfers in qa/1.x and see the error:

I have selected this content for having no specific characteristics other than being plain-text files.

Your environment (version of Archivematica, OS version, etc)

Archivematica qa/1.x post Archivematica stable/1.9.1. This does look like a regression as I cannot recreate it in 1.9.1 i.e. sandbox.


For Artefactual use:
Please make sure these steps are taken before moving this issue from Review to Verified in Waffle:

  • All PRs related to this issue are properly linked 👍
  • All PRs related to this issue have been merged 👍
  • Test plan for this issue has been implemented and passed 👍
  • Documentation regarding this issue has been written and it has been added to the release notes, if needed 👍
@ross-spencer ross-spencer added Severity: medium An inconvenient situation where the software is usable but inconvenient or slow. Severity: high A high-priority situation where performance or other uses are significantly impacted or degraded. labels Apr 11, 2019
@ross-spencer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Placing a severity on this, as it may be causing this validation issue:

image

(I need to try outside of a dev branch, and in 1.9)

@ross-spencer ross-spencer changed the title Problem: AIP mets isn't being pretty-printed before being saved to an AIP Problem: PIM error in METS in qa/1.x (1.10 candidates) Document does not conform to PREMIS in METS best practice Apr 16, 2019
@ross-spencer ross-spencer changed the title Problem: PIM error in METS in qa/1.x (1.10 candidates) Document does not conform to PREMIS in METS best practice Problem: There is a PIM error in METS in qa/1.x (1.10 candidates) Document does not conform to PREMIS in METS best practice Apr 16, 2019
@ross-spencer
Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue turned into a bit of a mess trying to understand things, so closing in favor of: #655

@ross-spencer ross-spencer removed Severity: high A high-priority situation where performance or other uses are significantly impacted or degraded. Severity: medium An inconvenient situation where the software is usable but inconvenient or slow. labels Apr 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant