Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Confusion between Pluperfect and Resultative past tense Perfective + missing forms (tense) #42

Open
varie opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Confusion between Pluperfect and Resultative past tense Perfective + missing forms (tense) #42

varie opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jonorthwash
Labels
lexc - missing morphology

Comments

@varie
Copy link
Contributor

varie commented Feb 9, 2022

  1. According to Gavril Torotoev's table forms like "барбыт этим" are called Pluperfect (PLPF), such form is missing in the transducer.

  2. According to Gavril Torotoev's table forms like "барбыппын" and "баран турабын" are called Resultative past tense Perfective 1st and 2nd respectively. Apertium-sah analyses form "барбыппын" as past and ger_past ⋅ px1sg ⋅ acc, "баран турабын" form is missing and those two words are analysed as separate tokens.
@varie varie changed the title Confusion between Pluperfect and Resultative past tense Perfective + missing forms Confusion between Pluperfect and Resultative past tense Perfective + missing forms (tense) Feb 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jonorthwash jonorthwash

Labels
lexc - missing morphology
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jonorthwash @varie