From a0978131d61e4b81d9cec50c4671da4dac3d9ff2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1=20Zemanovi=C4=8D?= Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:27:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] spec/pos/reward: update unbonding offset --- .../src/economics/proof-of-stake/reward-distribution.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/documentation/specs/src/economics/proof-of-stake/reward-distribution.md b/documentation/specs/src/economics/proof-of-stake/reward-distribution.md index 70f662f97a..12af208dd6 100644 --- a/documentation/specs/src/economics/proof-of-stake/reward-distribution.md +++ b/documentation/specs/src/economics/proof-of-stake/reward-distribution.md @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ Consider a system with - a set of validators $V_i$. - a set of delegations $D_{i, j}$, each to a particular validator and in a particular (initial) amount. - epoched proof-of-stake, where changes are applied as follows: - - bonding after the pipeline length - - unbonding after the unbonding length - - rewards are paid out at the end of each epoch, to wit, in each epoch $e$, $R_{e,i}$ is paid out to validator $V_i$ - - slashing is applied as described in [slashing](cubic-slashing.md). + - bonding after the pipeline length + - unbonding after the pipeline + unbonding length + - rewards are paid out at the end of each epoch, to wit, in each epoch $e$, $R_{e,i}$ is paid out to validator $V_i$ + - slashing is applied as described in [slashing](cubic-slashing.md). We wish to approximate as exactly as possible the following ideal delegator reward distribution system: