-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
single connection pool for posting/checking #113
Comments
Thanks for the suggestion! Yeah, I've been considering this for a while. It would remove the check connections option and checking would be done on connections from the pool. The other idea I was considering was request pipelining, since that should be possible with |
That would be really great! My limit is also 50 connections. It would be nice if this could be sped up. Do you have any general recommendations when using NVMe? With larger files I often/always get: |
By default, Maybe this suggestion to abandon checking once enough articles have been found, could be a solution.
You just need enough to avoid throttling - you'll get a
Maybe try using a larger |
Thank you for your feedback. So it is normal that the check (after finished upload) can take a few seconds (up to a few minutes), correct? I seem to be doing well with
I have set Powerful and stable tool, thank you for sharing your skills! |
Depends on the server. Check requires the post to show up; if the server isn't showing signs of the post existing, it'll wait some time.
The option is mostly useful if you have high bandwidth but a CPU without AES acceleration (which I can't imagine to be terribly common). |
Currently, it seems, that nyuu forces users to create 2 connection pools for posting and checking. In my first attempt at using it, I specified
-n 45
and-k 1
(I'm limited to 50 connections). However, 45 posters overwhelmed the 1 checker and it got rate limited because of that. I then moved to-n 40
and-k 5
and that seemed to work without any rate limiting. However, it seems weird to force it that way. why not be able to specify-n 45 -k -1
to have a single connection pool and just use the normal "poster" connections to check whenever there are entries in the check queue.From my example, it would seem that the majority of connections would still be used for posting, without the user having to manage / waste connections they have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: