Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mat-Table : Add vertical scrolling only on mat rows and not on mat header row. #10698

Closed
razorhenry1 opened this issue Apr 4, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@razorhenry1
Copy link

Bug, feature request, or proposal:

Proposal

What is the expected behavior?

Scroll should start from mat-rows ( tbody ) and not mat-header-rows (thead) .

What is the current behavior?

Right now , adding a scroll to mat-table, adds an overflow, starting from the header row level.

What are the steps to reproduce?

https://stackblitz.com/angular/jxdglymymvg?file=app%2Ftable-filtering-example.ts
Scroll appears at thead level ( mat-header- rows )

What is the use-case or motivation for changing an existing behavior?

The header usually remained fixed and overflow starts from tbody level.

Which versions of Angular, Material, OS, TypeScript, browsers are affected?

Angular Version : 5.1
Angular Material Version : 5.1.1

@donroyco
Copy link
Contributor

donroyco commented Apr 4, 2018

Duplicate of #5885

@bit7
Copy link

bit7 commented Aug 23, 2018

How do we still not have scrollable tables in the year 2018? Who's running the show around here?

@lramondev
Copy link

@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants