Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

assets paths can be confusing #637

Closed
joelanman opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

assets paths can be confusing #637

joelanman opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@joelanman
Copy link
Contributor

could be part of the refactoring work.

The users assets live in /assets in the kit, and are processed then copied to /public.

Some other assets are mapped to /assets in server.js, this is confusing.

@36degrees
Copy link
Contributor

@joelanman is this covered by #616?

@joelanman
Copy link
Contributor Author

partly yes, I think it would also be good to look into having less confusing paths. 'assets' in the back end being different to 'assets' in the front end is a bit confusing

@joelanman
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this will be fixed by #613, which uses the path extension-assets

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants