We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lean is now in the webserver Docker image so steps can be validated.
The repo https://github.com/allofphysicsgraph/lean-in-docker/tree/main/lean_v4 is for exploring how to validate a step.
A simple example would be applying the inference rule "add X to both sides" of a+b to get a+2 = b+2.
a+b
a+2 = b+2
In Lean, a=b is a proposition. We have to specify that a is Real and b is Real. Then we can prove that (a=b) -> (a+2=b+2).
a=b
a
b
(a=b) -> (a+2=b+2)
The relation between PDG and Lean is described here: https://physicsderivationgraph.blogspot.com/2023/06/translating-between-physics-derivation.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Review https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41946310/how-to-prove-a-b-%E2%86%92-a-1-b-1-in-lean
Sorry, something went wrong.
bhpayne
No branches or pull requests
Lean is now in the webserver Docker image so steps can be validated.
The repo https://github.com/allofphysicsgraph/lean-in-docker/tree/main/lean_v4 is for exploring how to validate a step.
A simple example would be applying the inference rule "add X to both sides" of
a+b
to geta+2 = b+2
.In Lean,
a=b
is a proposition. We have to specify thata
is Real andb
is Real. Then we can prove that(a=b) -> (a+2=b+2)
.The relation between PDG and Lean is described here: https://physicsderivationgraph.blogspot.com/2023/06/translating-between-physics-derivation.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: