diff --git a/docs/pages/user_guides/best_practice.md b/docs/pages/user_guides/best_practice.md index d547fd6..0e865c0 100644 --- a/docs/pages/user_guides/best_practice.md +++ b/docs/pages/user_guides/best_practice.md @@ -23,11 +23,16 @@ Imagine a system where a heat pump is used to produce _heat_ for both heating an > requirements, so it is up to the user to decide how to name the energy carriers. However, it is recommended to keep > the energy carriers as separate as reasonable. -!!! tip "Definition" - According to ISO 13600, an energy carrier is either a substance or a phenomenon that can be used to produce - mechanical work or heat or to operate chemical or physical processes. _This may be seen as motivation why, in this - case, the argument "both are heat" may not be valid: In the end, the actual "carrier" is most likely water, and not - "heat" (even if that is most commonly used as "carrier"). However, no one would argue to actually use "water" in - this example, which shows that the choice of `heat` would already be "not 100% exact"; therefore, the separation - into different two carriers does not "mis-represent" reality, but instead just makes our "abstraction" (= not using - `water` as carrier) more explicit._ +:::{admonition} Definition: Energy carrier +:class: tip + +_According to ISO 13600, an energy carrier is either a substance or a phenomenon that can be used to produce +mechanical work or heat or to operate chemical or physical processes._ + +This may be seen as motivation why, in this +case, the argument "both are heat" may not be valid: In the end, the actual "carrier" is most likely `water`, and not +`heat` (even if that is most commonly used as "carrier"). However, no one would argue to actually use `water` in +this example, which shows that the choice of `heat` would already be "not 100% exact"; therefore, the separation +into different two carriers does not "mis-represent" reality, but instead just makes our "abstraction" (= not using +`water` as carrier) more explicit. +:::