You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2019. It is now read-only.
is an eventual send using the proposed infix bang syntactic sugar. It needs to expand to something. For present purposes, we also need to write out code without sugar. The expansion currently supported by this repository
Vow.resolve(bob).e.foo(carol)
serves neither of these purposes well. For manually written code, I suggest
E(bob).foo(carol)
where E is equivalent to
functionE(target){returnVow.resolve(target).e;}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The danger leaving in support for either .e. or E(...) is that the exposed proxy may be reified rather than immediately invoked. If we continue to use either of these, we probably want to give ourselves a linting rule to catch this easy error.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
is an eventual send using the proposed infix bang syntactic sugar. It needs to expand to something. For present purposes, we also need to write out code without sugar. The expansion currently supported by this repository
serves neither of these purposes well. For manually written code, I suggest
where
E
is equivalent toThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: