Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(mapto): fix return type of get/getLazy #55

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2021

Conversation

grubyak
Copy link
Contributor

@grubyak grubyak commented Apr 15, 2021

Fixes the bug : #47

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #55 (110af42) into master (f18aa96) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #55   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.71%   97.71%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         306      306           
  Branches       48       48           
=======================================
  Hits          299      299           
  Misses          7        7           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ComponentMapping.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Page.tsx 96.66% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 58f5343...110af42. Read the comment docs.

@grubyak grubyak merged commit 171254c into master Apr 15, 2021
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2021
## [1.1.6](v1.1.5...v1.1.6) (2021-04-15)

### Bug Fixes

* **mapto:** fix return type of get/getLazy  ([#55](#55)) ([171254c](171254c))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.6 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@CezCz CezCz deleted the 47-mapto-return-typescript branch April 21, 2022 13:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants