We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Component
@mozaic-ds/1.41.0
On the screenshot above, we can see that option card inputs have a z-index that put them above the header.
This is most probably due to their z-index: 4 that is set on the class .mc-option-card__input.
z-index: 4
.mc-option-card__input
Is there any reason to have this z-index forced, and not left to its natural value? Or is there any alternative to avoid this behaviour?
No response
Go to https://dev-dpe-simulation-tool-frlm-uat1.nprd.kobi.adeo.cloud/simulateur-diagnostic-energetique/questionnaire/questions/9?direction=forward Scroll down to have the option cards visible Scroll up to have the header come back, and overlap the option cards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mohamedMok
No branches or pull requests
I am opening an issue for
Component
Package version
@mozaic-ds/1.41.0
Description
On the screenshot above, we can see that option card inputs have a z-index that put them above the header.
This is most probably due to their
z-index: 4
that is set on the class.mc-option-card__input
.Is there any reason to have this z-index forced, and not left to its natural value? Or is there any alternative to avoid this behaviour?
GitHub repository
No response
Mock-up(s)
No response
What happened?
No response
What is expected?
No response
To Reproduce
Go to https://dev-dpe-simulation-tool-frlm-uat1.nprd.kobi.adeo.cloud/simulateur-diagnostic-energetique/questionnaire/questions/9?direction=forward
Scroll down to have the option cards visible
Scroll up to have the header come back, and overlap the option cards.
Code example
No response
Is this a regression?
Additional comments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: