Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating network security policies for GCP #869

Conversation

shreyas-phansalkar-189
Copy link
Contributor

Removing obsolete Network policies and Adding new policies for Google Compute Firewall

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #869 (a545a52) into master (7a4de55) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #869   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.29%   78.29%           
=======================================
  Files         164      164           
  Lines        4359     4359           
=======================================
  Hits         3413     3413           
  Misses        730      730           
  Partials      216      216           

@shreyas-phansalkar-189 shreyas-phansalkar-189 merged commit c04acd4 into tenable:master Jun 16, 2021
@shreyas-phansalkar-189 shreyas-phansalkar-189 deleted the feature/gcp_network_policies_sp branch June 16, 2021 14:29
shreyas-phansalkar-189 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2021
* Adding missing Id field for GCP policies

* Updating network security policies for GCP (#869)

* Adding missing Id field for GCP policies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants