Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mkdocs-material to 6.2.8 #539

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2021

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pyup-bot pyup-bot commented Feb 4, 2021

This PR updates mkdocs-material from 6.2.7 to 6.2.8.

The bot wasn't able to find a changelog for this release. Got an idea?

Links

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 4, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #539 (d8a354d) into master (dabcffb) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #539   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.34%   75.34%           
=======================================
  Files          94       94           
  Lines        2235     2235           
=======================================
  Hits         1684     1684           
  Misses        408      408           
  Partials      143      143           

Copy link
Contributor

@jlk jlk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Went over release notes, looks fairly simple.

@jlk jlk merged commit b579bec into master Feb 10, 2021
@jlk jlk deleted the pyup-update-mkdocs-material-6.2.7-to-6.2.8 branch February 10, 2021 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants